Objectives: The present study aimed to address this gap in the literature by comparing the effects of longitudinal and transverse incisions on clinical and functional outcomes. Methods: Between 2018 and 2023, 44 patients (six males and 38 females) who underwent surgical release for DQV were included in the study. A transverse incision (TI) was performed in 16 patients, and a longitudinal incision (LI) was performed in 28 patients. Patients completed the Quick Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand (QuickDASH), Visual Analog Scale (VAS), and Patient-Rated Wrist Evaluation (PRWE) questionnaires. Patients were divided into two groups: the LI group and the TI group. The groups were compared in terms of VAS, QuickDASH, PRWE specific function (PRWESF), PRWE usual function (PRWE-UF), PRWE function (PRWE-F), PRWE pain (PRWE-P), and PRWE total (PRWE-T) scores and complications. Results: No statistically significant differences were identified between the groups in terms of VAS, QuickDASH, PRWESF, PRWE-UF, PRWE-F, PRWE-P, and PRWE-T scores. Conclusion: Both incision techniques provided satisfactory clinical and functional outcomes. No statistically significant differences were identified between the groups; however, larger prospective studies are required to determine whether clinically meaningful differences exist between incision orientations. Keywords: De Quervain, tenosynovitis, surgery
Corresponding Author: Mert Kahraman Maraşlı